<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Damned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/</link>
	<description>The Internet Home of Mr. Fish, upholder of Truth and Horseshit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drcorky</title>
		<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/comment-page-1/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>drcorky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clowncrack.com/?p=1030#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>dr corky says maybe its him only having one arm that make him look so ma-sterious and sex-ay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dr corky says maybe its him only having one arm that make him look so ma-sterious and sex-ay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jill the disenchanted liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/comment-page-1/#comment-4096</link>
		<dc:creator>jill the disenchanted liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clowncrack.com/?p=1030#comment-4096</guid>
		<description>Not so sex-ay this time around, drcorky!  Not so sex-ay in the least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so sex-ay this time around, drcorky!  Not so sex-ay in the least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another fish</title>
		<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/comment-page-1/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>another fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clowncrack.com/?p=1030#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>Where is Howard Dean anyway.  Draft Dean for President !  Please !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Howard Dean anyway.  Draft Dean for President !  Please !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/comment-page-1/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clowncrack.com/?p=1030#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>that about sums it up. good work mr. fish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that about sums it up. good work mr. fish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drcorky</title>
		<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/comment-page-1/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator>drcorky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clowncrack.com/?p=1030#comment-3939</guid>
		<description>dr corky says now that&#039;s a sex-ay lookin obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dr corky says now that&#8217;s a sex-ay lookin obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donex</title>
		<link>http://www.clowncrack.com/2010/03/08/gop-damned/comment-page-1/#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>donex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clowncrack.com/?p=1030#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>well done mr. fish !
there&#039;s a certain irony here, as we know, because in 1951 (or, more accurately a few years prior) despite all the regressive items you mention, we would have actually had in the white house a president more  supportive and committed to truly reforming health care and providing universal medical coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done mr. fish !<br />
there&#8217;s a certain irony here, as we know, because in 1951 (or, more accurately a few years prior) despite all the regressive items you mention, we would have actually had in the white house a president more  supportive and committed to truly reforming health care and providing universal medical coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

