Thanks for something that will confuse many. Both options are lead poisoning.
Glenn
The concept of human perfection, that Fig A can stand without Fig B, or that Fig B can stand without Fig A, belongs to the future of a time past, of a past both cherished and non-existent.
Glenn
Consider that the State holds the dominant position in lawful use of threats of violence in support of its self-declared rights and existence;
And that Corporations are the legitimate offspring of the State, they being declared, by their creators, to be lawful, albeit artificial, persons;
And the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., once given freely by him to the world are now owned by another entity, their ownership and usage limits enforced by the State;
And Martin Luther King Jr., who exercised free speech publicly while unarmed, knowing full well that any armed act of self-defense would result in a massive reactionary attack and death at Edmond Pettus Bridge by a lawless standing occupying army;
And Martin Luther King Jr. knew that when the KKK would come to his door there would be no point in calling the police, because the police were already there;
And that to be disarmed in private would be to put too much faith in a faithless government;
Martin Luther King Jr. frequently had weapons for protection where he dwelled and was once denied his application to carry a gun;
It is all fantasy anyway.
Thanks for something that will confuse many. Both options are lead poisoning.
The concept of human perfection, that Fig A can stand without Fig B, or that Fig B can stand without Fig A, belongs to the future of a time past, of a past both cherished and non-existent.
Consider that the State holds the dominant position in lawful use of threats of violence in support of its self-declared rights and existence;
And that Corporations are the legitimate offspring of the State, they being declared, by their creators, to be lawful, albeit artificial, persons;
And the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., once given freely by him to the world are now owned by another entity, their ownership and usage limits enforced by the State;
And Martin Luther King Jr., who exercised free speech publicly while unarmed, knowing full well that any armed act of self-defense would result in a massive reactionary attack and death at Edmond Pettus Bridge by a lawless standing occupying army;
And Martin Luther King Jr. knew that when the KKK would come to his door there would be no point in calling the police, because the police were already there;
And that to be disarmed in private would be to put too much faith in a faithless government;
Martin Luther King Jr. frequently had weapons for protection where he dwelled and was once denied his application to carry a gun;
What was the question again?